The RSA is, almost fundamentally, a place of debate. We debate at lectures with speakers; we debate online with the media; but most of all, we debate amongst ourselves. We debate the morning’s news over breakfast; we debate project and report details at lunch; we debate existentialist dilemmas and the meaning of life over late-night drinks; and the cycle begins anew.
But lately we’ve been debating even more than usual, because the topic of discussion has not been about this or that, but about us and what we stand for. A consensus on a new agenda is (slowly) building around the idea of ‘the power to create’: the belief that “all should have the freedom and capacity to turn their ideas into reality”. This emerging worldview was first articulated by Adam Lent, Director of RSA’s Action and Research Centre.
It’s a concept that embodies two of our core principles:
- Creativity:that individual and collective ingenuity will be key to successfully addressing the complex web of social, economic and ecological challenges we now face as a society
- Inclusivity: that the best solutions to these challenges will emerge from the bottom-up, rather than be imposed from the top-down
Where debate has broken out, it has typically concerned the lack of stipulation of which ideas we want to help people turn into reality. Jonathan Rowson posted a full discussion of this issue, but for brevity I quote Paul Swann's comment, which put it thus:
“Calling for an ‘unprecedented explosion of creative endeavour’ is all well and good, but to what ends? Perpetual growth, short-term profits and increasing greenhouse gas emissions..?”
Paul’s question highlights that ‘the power to create’ is silent on what is surely a third pillar of our principles: the issue of social responsibility. In other words, are we advocating a kind of capitalist creativity which rewards any innovation that is profitable, regardless of externalities? Or are we, with tonight’s speaker, David Harvey, promoting a revolutionary creativity to oppose capital’s exploitation of people and planet? I cannot speak for my colleagues, but I find the question interesting as an exercise in questioning my own ideals.
‘The power to create’ is silent on what is surely a third pillar of our principles: the issue of social responsibility
“Ultimately”, it was said in our latest round of debate, “what will give any prospective agenda meaning is not the words we use, but the work we do.” And perhaps the work I am doing is illustrative of the kind of creativity I want to see in the world. Following on from a productive round table discussion with manufacturing representatives, policy makers, academics and NGOs, I am exploring the potential for a new project to accelerate the transition towards sustainable manufacturing. The creative, inclusive and responsible vision here is one of a circular economy, in which production is localised rather than centralised, mass customisation replaces mass production, and pollution and waste become inputs rather than outputs of manufacturing.
Continuing the theme of working with business rather than against it, I am working on the RSA’s new Premium, which addresses the fact that we are chronically under-investing in our workforce, leaving people unproductive and unfulfilled. Grounded in the belief that great ideas can come from anywhere, Valuing Your Talent is a crowdsourcing challenge open to all, generating practical innovations to help businesses (particularly SMEs) recognise and make the case for greater investment in their people - get involved today!
What these two projects have in common is that they seek radical, transformative change in the way businesses work, but they do so through a collaborative rather than confrontational approach. So if our work says more than our words about who we are, then to the question, ‘what kind of creativity do I want to see in the world?’ I say:
‘This kind of creativity!’
Conor Quinn works in the RSA's Action and Research Centre. Follow him @conorquinn85