Yesterday's post was self indulgent and silly (not to mention giving 'OldAndrew' an open goal). To have something different on my homepage, I am posting from my mini break in France.
I am looking for thoughts on a question which is at the front of my mind right now: what are the best conditions for small groups of people to develop good ideas and (the ' and' is very important) commit to taking the ideas forward.
A few suggestions to get us going:
1. A group incentive is good but it should not be so large that it distracts (see Dan Pink's world beating Animate) or introduces perverse incentives.
2. Apparently, according to some research I plan to look into properly next week, 12 is the optimum group size to develop ideas (strikes me as a bit big).
3. There needs to be clear norms - or even explicit rules - which stop the people with the loudest voices or strongest opinions from dominating.
4. Like the incentive, the focus should be medium sized - not so wide that the conversation lacks a thread, not so narrow to stifle imagination.
There's four to be going on with - over to you dear readers ...
Related articles
-
Young people and the cost of living crisis
Toby Murray
Young people are on the frontline of the cost-of-living crisis. Here we explore what the cost of living crisis means for the economic security of young people.
-
Future of engineering: skills and safety for an evolving sector
Fabian Wallace-Stephens Emma Morgante
Safety in engineering is vital and introducing new technologies to protect workers is important in supporting the future of the profession. This blog outlines milestones in a related project and discusses upcoming engagement opportunities.
-
RSA Catalyst Awards 2022: Round two winners announced
Beth D'Elia
Announcing the eight innovation projects receiving RSA Catalyst funding in round two of 2022's awards.
Be the first to write a comment
Comments
Please login to post a comment or reply
Don't have an account? Click here to register.