Devo Met: charting a path ahead - RSA

Devo Met: charting a path ahead

Report 2 Comments

  • Community and place-based action
  • Democracy and governance

An ambitious new timetable for the clear and transparent devolution of power to UK cities must quickly be put in place by the next government, says the RSA’s latest report on city growth and devolution.

Engage with OUR research


Influenced by the RSA City Growth Commission, considerable policy progress has been made. Since the Commission’s final report, ‘Unleashing Metro Growth, published in October 2014, Greater Manchester, Sheffield and Leeds city-regions have agreed devolution deals with central government. Greater Manchester has also been given control of its health and social care budget, amounting to an additional £6bn of devolved funding to the Combined Authority and its partners.

In the recent Budget, the Chancellor announced that Greater Manchester and Cambridge would be able to retain 100% business rate revenue, informing the wider review of the local non-domestic property tax.

However, a clear framework for sub-national devolution is needed to bring transparency and legitimacy to what has so far been an evolving series of ad hoc deals and closed door arrangements. This report calls on the government to establish anIndependent City Devolution Commission (ICDC) - the equivalent of the Smith Commission for city devolution - to quickly work up policy detail and guide draft legislation.

An ICDC would ensure that city-regions which can demonstrate competence, accountability and collaboration, and have the economic platform and potential to shoulder financial risks, should be able to enter into devolution negotiations with central government. The report suggested that the Independent City Devolution Commission (ICDC) could be responsible for holding government to account for the pace and degree of progress on devolution, reporting annually to Parliament.

The Commission would help to work through five areas that need to be resolved if the UK is to resume a sense of stable and coherent political economy:

  1. Legislative: This is needed to make provision for new metro mayors, and will need to be drafted ahead of the 2015 Queen’s Speech to ensure inclusion in the first Parliamentary session.

  2. Public Service Reform: This is needed to improve outcomes and drive down costs, designed and delivered more effectively at local level.

  3. Fiscal Devolution: The most mature city-regions should be able to borrow more flexibly, leveraging private finance and the value of their public sector assets.

  4. Deficit reduction and a place-based Spending Review: Multi-year Local Government Finance settlements will be essential to enable place-based strategic investment and allowing cities to become more financially self-sustainable.

  5. Capacity and Collaboration: Capacity varies between city-regions, but metros need to build a track record of effective governance, risk management, policy delivery, data analysis and evaluation.

pdf 495.8 KB

Join the discussion


Please login to post a comment or reply

Don't have an account? Click here to register.

  • This is basically excellent and long overdue. Central government has often resisted serious devolution of this kind. I have not read the report yet, but would point out some challenges:

    * Mayors - tension between indidividuals' desire to make a mark and the collaborative ethos in point 5. here.

    * Democratic visibility. Voters can understand the actions of individual Councils, but lose the plot in complex joint arrangements

  • I'm involved in a local RSA-led project to improve transport and environmental planning in the Bristol city-region, whose population is forecast to grow without adequate infrastructure, it's a shame to me that the new report doesn't tackle the issues raised by local authorities failing to agree to collaborate in a way that permits effective LEPs or the creation of Combined Authorities. The Centre for Cities has written on this in respect of Bristol - whose purely economic data don't demonstrate the need for metro devolution so much as does its bad transport system and threats from under-planned growth to its environmental assets.