Matthew TaylorI don’t know whether to be flattered or insulted – my old friend, John Prescott, has launched an attack on me on his website which has been picked up in several other places.
JP describes me as a ‘pointy head’, a policy wonk’ and ‘the type of person I would describe as a Mekon’. I am flattered by the suggestion that I am an intellectual; I have never really got over someone introducing me as ‘Matthew Taylor – he runs a think tank, but is more tank than think’.
Unfortunately, JP, in attacking me, is misleading his readers. He says that I said that Labour should ‘host the white flag’ and ‘give up’. In fact, what I advocated in my blog was what I saw as Labour’s best chance of staying electorally competitive – to focus on the economic crisis and try to put party politics on the back burner until there is some good news.
Maybe John’s definition of a Mekon is someone who tries to understand an argument before attacking it. On this basis many more of us would qualify as being ‘pointy headed intellectuals'.
All of which reminds me of the old Soviet joke:
A: One who can read, one who can write and one to keep an eye on the two dangerous intellectuals!
In his fifth post for the RSA Living Change Campaign, Matthew Taylor explores some of the implications of the framework he has outlined over the last month and asks why ideas like these aren’t more widely known and used.
As we emerge from Covid-19, Ruth Hannan argues there is an opportunity to shift from short-term solutions to approaches based on deeper understanding of citizens’ needs and which focus on systemic change.
If young people are to flourish in this new world of rapid change and insecurity, we need policies that support young people in the here and now, whilst also protecting their futures. Thinking about economic security is one way to do this.