The RSA uses cookies on this website. By using this website you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more read our cookie policy and privacy policy. More Info

The economic crisis we ignore every day

Blog 3 Comments

  • Future of Work
  • Economics and Finance
  • Employment

Day to day interactions underpin our national mind set. We need to take 'the economy of regard' seriously, argues Matthew Taylor.

A subplot of Ali Smith’s powerful post-Brexit novel 'Autumn' concerns the narrator’s frustrating experience of trying to renew her passport at the Post Office in the face of a variety of increasingly ridiculous bureaucratic hurdles. Smith subtly invites us to make a connection between the officious and hostile way the state sometimes treats people and the disenchantment with authority that fuelled many referendum votes.   

In his vivid and humane book ‘The Ordinary Virtues’, historian and public intellectual Michael Ignatieff reflects on discussions around the world – from Rio to Fukushima - with civic activists and people living in poor communities. Ignatieff notes the irrelevance of either human rights or global ethics discourses to the lives of people trying to survive and get on with each other in diverse, deprived communities. In extolling the importance of ordinary virtues like honesty, trust, and mutual respect he writes; ‘only when citizens feel they are treated with minimum decency by their own public institutions can they be expected to treat strangers with equal decency’. 

Both Smith and Ignatieff encourage us to understand what is right and wrong about our world, not through ideologies or conceptual frameworks, but through the eyes of people, especially those whose lives are toughest, going about their day to day business relying, in part, on strangers to survive or prosper.

There is quantitative data to support the view that day to day interaction underpin our national mind set. The World Values Survey finds those countries with the lowest levels of interpersonal trust are also those most hostile to outsiders.

But if our capacity to treat strangers decently, preferably kindly, is a national asset who is doing the accounting? The sad truth is that the strongest processes at play in our world are systematically degrading this asset.

In public services the combination of austerity, regulation and fear of blame means too often citizens are treated with what feels like indifference or hostility. What parent or child thinks they are as important to a school as OFSTED? How can social carers - many on the minimum wage, some forced to pose as ‘self-employed’ - allocated fifteen minute time slots with patients be expected to do more than the bare minimum? From benefits claimants to taxpayers to drivers it often feels that state officials are incentivised not to help us but to catch us out before punishing us summarily.

As consumers of commercial services we are motivated very often by the bottom line, something exacerbated by the ease of internet price comparison. One consequence is that businesses try to make their profits by minimising customer care and maximising the scope for hidden add-ons. Large parts of the retail financial service sector has become a disorganised conspiracy against the consumer. Time and again – broadband providers and delivery services being among the worst offenders – customer ‘help’ services seem to have been designed to encourage people to give up seeking help or even the truth.

And now to add to conventional media outlets with a business model based on maximising human contempt for others, we have the world of social media. A world in which immediacy and anonymity fuel disinhibited nastiness. As Michel Ignatieff said in his RSA event, in fifty thousand or so face to face meetings with the public as a politician he faced rudeness on only a handful of occasions while the responses he got on social media were so vile his wife tried to stop him reading them.

At home and abroad, most obviously in the US, a political class which in a different universe might be trying to pour oil on these troubled waters is instead cranking up the wave machine. Wider political discourse feels ever more like a massive exercise in grievance mongering. Established institutions – like the church or the BBC – seem too busy fighting a rearguard action against their own reputational crises to name what is happening, let alone fight back.  

Twenty years ago the economic historian Avner Offer coined the phrase ‘the economy of regard’ to describe the ways in which institutions and norms embed reciprocity and mutual respect in our societies. Today this economy is in deficit, beset by asset strippers, possibly heading for bankruptcy.

Look back if you like, but my posts aren’t usually like this. I’m not normally shrill and negative. I may sound like a grumpy old man damning the world because he was put on hold by a call centre. But what Ali Smith and Michael Ignatieff have brought home to me in their very different, but equally eloquent, ways is that this small stuff – the way we treat each other every day – adds up to the big stuff.

We need to take the economy of regard seriously. We need to reach out to people who recognise the same problem even if they name different causes and have different remedies. And we need a starting point.

In my Employment Review I offered five reasons for a national commitment to good work; redefining the social contract, promoting health and wellbeing, boosting productivity, encouraging active citizenship and responding to technological change. Here is a sixth – valuing the ordinary virtues. If there is no decency or respect in the way a person is employed or managed and if there is no scope or encouragement for the worker themselves to show kindness in their job, then this is a job which saps the economy of regard. And that is something we simply can’t afford. 

Join the discussion

3 Comments

Please login to post a comment or reply

Don't have an account? Click here to register.

  • Were you put on hold by a call centre? I hate that too! But seriously, I think social media gives an inaccurate impression of our economy of regard. Trust in others in the UK has remained fairly constant over the last 20 years (although membership of voluntary organisations has declined): https://ourworldindata.org/trust Digging a bit deeper, it seems social capital can be broken down into more than trust (e.g. trust in others, social support, participating in voluntary organisations) and there are inequalities that need to be addressed, but again it’s not all bad news: http://csi.nuff.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/CSI_15_The_uneven_distribution.pdf The place where there does seem to have been a credit crunch in the economy of regard is online, and there are many different opinions about where it’s all going. Though there are plenty of doomsayers, not everyone thinks we’re heading for hell in a smartphone-equipped handbasket: http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/03/29/the-future-of-free-speech-trolls-anonymity-and-fake-news-online/ My feeling is to step away from the digital world, psychologically if not actually, and try to stay grounded in everyday encounters, which aren’t so bad.

  • Another possible contributor to the growing deficit in theeconomy of regard is the change in our social behaviours. If we do not showregard for each other outside of the workplace, it is a leap to expect thesebehaviours to be naturally occurring whilst under pressure at work.

     

    The small, big, stuff of face-to-face connection betweenstrangers is all but disappearing from our experience of life.

     

    With so much time spent in the “eyes down” position requiredto monitor the screen of our phones, we are losing the possibility of makingeye contact, exchanging a nod of greeting, a smile.

     

    The social glue of a friendly exchange with people who serveus, share a train ride with us, wait at the pedestrian crossing alongside us,those small, seemingly insignificant everyday acts are sometimes the big stuff­—amoment for human connection that shifts the quality of the day.

  • No, Matthew! You are not a grumpy old man. On the contrary, you are merely giving expression to the frustrations many people are presently feeling the length and breadth of the UK; owing in part to the apparent stupidity of British officialism. The officious and hostile way in which ordinary men and women are treated has, in my view, led to the gigantic blunder of our modern history, namely, Brexit. It will be years before we get to the bottom of it. The precipitous events leading up to Brexit are the subject of my current blogpost, "Honey Badger. I interviewed him 9 years ago. You may look it up on: https://thekamugasachallenge.com/ 

Related articles