The RSA uses cookies on this website. By using this website you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more read our cookie policy and privacy policy. More Info

The Extremism Paradox

RSA Event


Durham Street Auditorium, RSA House

  • Communities
  • Arts and society

The early twenty-first century has been defined by a rise in Islamist radicalisation and a concurrent rise in far right extremism.

Rising star and extremism expert Julia Ebner argues that far right and Islamist extremist narratives – ‘The West is at war with Islam’ and ‘Muslims are at war with the West’ - complement each other perfectly, making the two extremes rhetorical allies and building a spiralling torrent of hatred – what she calls ‘The Rage’.

By looking at extremist movements both online and offline, Ebner shows how far right and Islamist extremists have succeeded in penetrating each other’s echo chambers as a result of their mutually useful messages. She visits the RSA to introduce us to the world of reciprocal radicalisation and the hotbeds of extremism that have developed – with potentially disastrous consequences - in the UK, Europe and the US.


Twitter  Instagram  


Be the first to write a comment


Please login to post a comment or reply

Don't have an account? Click here to register.

Related events

  • Work won’t love you back


    By exploding the ‘labour of love’ myth, Sarah Jaffe encourages us to demand what our work is actually worth and reimagines a future built on care rather than exploitation.

  • How to Future-Proof Humanity

    Great Room Auditorium, RSA House

    What does it mean to be human in the digital age? Writer and broadcaster Paul Mason explores how to defend our rights and freedoms against the forces that threaten our humanity.

  • Why a 21st Century Enlightenment Needs Walls

    Great Room, RSA House

    Acclaimed social psychologist Jonathan Haidt explores how we can create institutions and public spaces that foster viewpoint diversity and mutual understanding, and where people can civilly and constructively disagree.