The RSA uses cookies on this website. By using this website you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more read our cookie policy and privacy policy. More Info

Building the consensus for a People’s Pension in Britain

Report

  • Design
  • Enterprise
  • Pensions

In the UK, the state pension is the lowest relative to income of any OECD country. We therefore depend on private provision. Yet only 50 percent of employees currently contribute to a private pension. For those who do save, the current system is poor, and savers are often unaware of how costly pensions can be. Reform is needed.

The system of occupational and private pensions in the UK is not fit for purpose. It is not the low cost, trustworthy system which savers justly demand. It needs reform.

This report outlines how the UK pensions system has ended up in such a poor position, and the key questions which policy makers now need to address.

  • A huge proportion of our pensions disappear in fees – with charges swallowing up to 40 percent of the value of the pension.

  • If a typical Dutch and a typical British person save the same amount for their pension, the Dutch person can expect a 50 percent higher income in retirement.

  • That minor changes to our regulatory framework could boost pension returns by 39 percent.

Few dispute these conclusions. Indeed most of the characteristics we suggest can be found in the pension systems of other countries, notably Denmark and Holland. Both are recognised as having one of the most effective pension provisions, and the lowest levels of pensioner poverty in the world.

The report describes what a "best practice" pension system would look like. It calls on the coalition government to build a broad cross party consensus in which political parties, employers, unions, and pension funds agree to implement a ‘pensions architecture’ that brings the UK in line with countries such as Holland and Denmark that enjoy the lowest levels of pensioner poverty in Europe.

  • Building on the positive but partial reforms which are currently in place, Britain should aim for a low cost system of occupational pensions, based on auto-enrolment, and a limited number of suppliers whose scale allows them to offer low costs.

  • Pension savings should be aggregated in a way which will give adequate returns; that suggests collective provision and trustee governance.

  • And those charged with investing our money should do so responsibly; as trustworthy agents of those whose money they invest.

The answer to Britain’s inadequate pensions is not just a technical one. It is also a political one. No single agent can create effective occupational pensions. It requires all stakeholders to work together; politicians of all political persuasions; regulators and policy makers; representatives both of employees and employers; advisors, actuaries, academics and think tanks; industry groups and pension providers.

pdf 307.2 KB

Contributors

Picture of David Pitt-Watson
David Pitt-Watson

Be the first to write a comment

0 Comments

Please login to post a comment or reply

Don't have an account? Click here to register.

Related reports

  • Collective pensions in the UK II

    Collective pensions provide a safer more predictable income in retirement. This report evaluates the performance of collective pensions and recommends they should become the standard in the UK.

  • Collective pensions in the UK

    This report looks at how collective pensions are so much more effective than individual provision.

  • Tomorrow's Investor report

    Investor disengagement exacerbated the recent financial crisis. How can ordinary savers connect better with the company they have invested in through their pensions or savings?