The RSA uses cookies on this website. By using this website you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more read our cookie policy and privacy policy. More Info

Don't read this, read that


A recently submitted comment on an old post, makes a valid point. It's in response to my repetitive and transparently self-serving requests for evidence that people read this blog:

'Matthew, ten people want you to keep on blogging. Please employ a cost-benefit analysis. R'

The comment (leading me immediately to suspect anyone whose name begins with the letter 'R') panders both to my unquenchable thirst for self-deprecation and encourages me to spend less time posting.  (See what you've done, 'R' - bet you feel pretty low now?)

Fortunately, I can kill two birds with one stone.  Towards the back end of last year, The Times ran a couple of articles by me in their '4th plinth' (as I call it) commentary slot.  I also got invited to some great breakfasts to coincide with the publication of the newspaper's Eureka supplement.  At last, I thought, my ambition to be a regular columnist is about to be fulfilled.  Sadly, the new dawn turned out to be a flash in the pan.  Since then, I've sent in loads of ideas, and even a couple of full columns, with no joy. 

So, human nature being what it is, you would expect me to read The Times comment pages with a jaundiced eye - 'how can they reject me and print this rubbish?'  But I am bigger than that, oh yes, and being big is made very easy today when there are four brilliant pieces:

Duncan Bannatyne, urging British entrepreneurs to invest in Haiti;

Richard Kemp, on why we should feel positive and determined in the face of bin Laden's latest claims;

David Aaronovitch, writing about the Edlington case with his usual mixture of common sense and scathing wit; and

Rachel Sylvester on Chilcot, making me feel (a little) better about my old boss. (Accompanied, for balance, by a clever and cruel cartoon.) 

The fact is I could write articles till the cows came home, made themselves a light supper and settled back to watch Newsnight (or should that be 'Moosnight'?) and still not match any of these. 

I guess I'll have to stick to the quality-assurance-free zone that is my blog.  Sorry 'R'!

Be the first to write a comment


Please login to post a comment or reply

Don't have an account? Click here to register.

Related articles

  • Coordination Theory: the basis for working together?

    Matthew Taylor

    In his fifth post for the RSA Living Change Campaign, Matthew Taylor explores some of the implications of the framework he has outlined over the last month and asks why ideas like these aren’t more widely known and used.

  • Wellbeing takes time

    Ruth Hannan

    As we emerge from Covid-19, Ruth Hannan argues there is an opportunity to shift from short-term solutions to approaches based on deeper understanding of citizens’ needs and which focus on systemic change.

  • Economic security and a better future for young people

    Hannah Webster

    If young people are to flourish in this new world of rapid change and insecurity, we need policies that support young people in the here and now, whilst also protecting their futures. Thinking about economic security is one way to do this.